After spending the last couple of weeks back in the states, the inevitable question of Mortgages comes up once again. Some swear to their impermissibility, others to the opposite, and then others to the need for alternatives. (I touched on a little of this here)
One of the problems that I have with all the alternatives is that they are typically costly and cliché in their approach, i.e. there are justified by two main arguments:
1. Place a religious person between you and Allah
2. Cost of Being Muslim (CoBM)
With several friends who are on the verge of either entering or exiting a mortgage because of the above, I started to think about how difficult of a question this is for anyone faced with it.
He can pay more because the company has a fatwa that says that they are rubber-stamped as “Islamic”, not enjoy any tax breaks, and pay a lot more than he would any where else.
OR
He can go with the conventional mortgage, enjoy the tax breaks, etc that entail a conventional mortgage, and gain the ire of the community for doing what is in their estimate unequivocally “Haram”.
This type of decision process lead me to really think about the reality of “Islamic” finance vehicles, esp. those related to home finance, and how they fit almost all the signs for Predatory Lending
At the Center for Responsible Lending, they identify seven signs for abuse of lending ability:
Predatory mortgage lending involves a wide array of abusive practices.
Here are brief descriptions of some of the most
common:
1. Excessive Fees
2. Abusive Prepayment Penalties
3. Kickbacks to Brokers (Yield Spread Premiums)
4. Loan Flipping
5. Unnecessary Products
6. Mandatory Arbitration
7. Steering & Targeting
So lets take these one by one:
Excessive Fees
Typical of many Islamic Mortgage companies, your _______ rate will be higher than the going interest rate, in fact a lot of times it is the interest rate with a tacked on percentage for “Clerical duties/company profit”
Abusive Prepayment Penalties
Many (I admit here, to my knowledge) of the companies offering “Islamic” Murabahah or Musharakah financing schemes do not allow for any prepayment of the debt incurred from purchasing a home. Thus the Muslim is locked into his debt for the remainder of his payment plan. Not only is this a sign of abuse in lending, but it goes against the principle of “Da’uu wa ta’ajaluu” (ضعوا وتعجلوا) or “Discount your debts for early payment”
Kickbacks to Brokers (Yield Spread Premiums)
Read Shariah Advisory boards and Lawyers that form SPV’s for the companies activities
Loan flipping
A lender “flips” a borrower by refinancing a loan to generate fee income
without providing any net tangible benefit to the borrower. Flipping can quickly
drain borrower equity and increase monthly payments — sometimes on homes that
had previously been owned free of debt.
Exactly what happens when a “Musharakah” loan is used instead of a “Murabahah” one, usually by re-appraisal of the property value according to the terms of the contract, so that as the home is sold off to the tenant/partner, it becomes even more expensive for him to buy because of rising property costs and cost of living.
Unnecessary products
Sometimes borrowers may pay more than necessary because lenders sell and finance
unnecessary insurance or other products along with the loan.
See “Kickbacks to Brokers” & “Excessive Fees” above
Mandatory arbitration
Some loan contracts require “mandatory arbitration,” meaning that the borrowers are not allowed to seek legal remedies in a court if they find that their home is threatened by loans with illegal or abusive terms. Mandatory arbitration makes it much less likely that borrowers will receive fair and appropriate remedies in cases of wrongdoing.
I don’t know about this sign, are there such clauses in contracts labels “Islamic”? Your input is needed.
Steering & Targeting
Predatory lenders may steer borrowers into subprime mortgages, even when the
borrowers could qualify for a mainstream loan…
Labeling it “Islamic” and feeding off the sensitivities of Muslims is enough to qualify for this sign.
For more of the Mortgage debate see the following:
I know what ever one is saying “You didnt mention the articles and research in favor of Islamic Mortgages!” Well thats because I didnt find any that amounted to anything more than appeals to authority (Approved by XYZ) or that werent fluffy articles in western newspapers that promoted western banks and their “Islamic” endevours.
So if you do have anything more than that than please do post to the comments sections.